standard share much in common with DIN. This paper con- siders BS , the draft ISO standard , and AGMA. Since this review was written. This standard specifies a method for rating the pitting resistance and bending .. In AGMA the values for Life Factor, CL and KL, Dynamic Factor, Cv and. Documents Similar To AGMA AGMA A Uploaded by. simone. castagnetti · AGMA. Uploaded by. Dipak · ANSI_AGMA_A Uploaded.
|Published (Last):||27 December 2008|
|PDF File Size:||1.79 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.72 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This standard is not applicable when any of the following conditions exist: The gear designer or manufacturer is not responsible for the total system unless such a requirement is clearly identified in the contractual agreement. Changes to the standard, based on committee experience and field performance of gear sets, include: In addition, the surface condition factor for pitting resistance, C fRis assigned values other than 1.
Calculations determine the allowable rating for pitting resistance and bending strength of external involute gear teeth. Geometrical definitions ISO This AGMA Standard and related publications are based on typical or average data, conditions, or applications. Changes to the standard, based on committee experience and field performance of gear sets, include:.
This standard was written to address the fundamental differences between typical enclosed drive applications and rolling mill applications.
The root profiles are stepped or irregular. Interference exists between tips of teeth and root fillets. The formulas of this standard are not applicable when any of the following conditions exist: It was approved as an American National Standard on September 23, Transmission accuracy level, A vis more than 10 Q v less than 7 ; Teeth have been surface hardened by syandard or flame hardening; Transverse contact ratio, m pis greater than 2.
This standard includes a method by which different gear tooth designs can be rated and compared at extended life cycles typical for these applications, sgandard to hours. Quantity must be a positive whole number.
The stress cycle factor for pitting resistance, Z NRconsists of a single curve above 10 7 cycles, and its value has been modified based on current practice. Experimental agna from actual gear unit measurements are seldom repeatable within a plus or minus 10 percent band. Strength and quality of materials ISO When not provided by the purchaser, motor service factor equal to 1.
218.01, the reduction in tooth root thickness due to protuberance below the active profile is handled correctly by this method. Compliance with this standard does not constitute a warranty of the rating of the gear set under installed field service conditions.
All publications are subject to revision, and the users of this standard are encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the publications listed. It was approved as an American National Standard on December 28, For root profiles which are stepped or irregular, other stress correction factors may be more appropriate. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document including any amendments applies. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid.
Completely enclosed gear drives or speed reducers are expressly excluded from this standard. The first draft of this standard was prepared in December Where root fillets of the gear teeth are produced by a process other than generating. Compliance with this standard does not constitute a warranty of the rating of the gear set under installed field service conditions. For most designs covered by this standard, pointed teeth are defined as those with normal chordal top land thickness, t oless than 0.
Item Detail – ANSI/AGMA B15
Limitations The formulae of this standard are not applicable to other types of gear tooth deterioration such as wear, case crushing, and welding. For information on combination drives, see Annex J. Experimental data from actual gear unit measurements are seldom repeatable within a plus or minus 10 percent band.
It is not intended for use by the engineering stadard at large. Empirical factors given in this standard are general in nature. Mixing values from other standards with those from this standard could lead to erroneous ratings. SCOPE Applicability This standard provides a method to determine the power abma of gear sets with spur and helical conventional pinions and spur self-aligning pinions for cylindrical grinding mills, kilns, coolers, and dryers.
Values for factors assigned in other standards are not applicable to this standard, nor are the values assigned in this standard applicable standwrd other standarf. Design considerations to prevent fractures emanating from stress risers on the tooth profile, tip chipping, and failures of the gear blank through the web or hub should be analyzed by general machine design methods.
The formulas evaluate gear tooth capacity as influenced by the major factors which affect standxrd tooth pitting and gear tooth fracture at the fillet radius.
Quantity must be a positive whole number. Design considerations to prevent fractures emanating from stress risers on the tooth profile, tip chipping, and failures of the gear blank through the web or hub should be analyzed by general machine design methods.
Suggestions for improvement of this standard will be welcome. Changes to the standard include a new dynamic factor analysis as a function of transmission accuracy number, revised allowable stress numbers, the use of the stress cycle factor in the rating practice, and ratings for gears xgma from ductile iron. The detailed treatment of the general rating formulas for specific applications is best accomplished by those experienced in the field.
Undercut exists in an area above the theoretical start of active profile.
Proper evaluation of these factors is essential for realistic ratings. Additional limitations are noted within the body of this standard. The purpose of this standard is to establish a common base for rating various types of gears for differing applications, and to encourage themaximum practical degree of uniformity and consistency between rating practices within the gear industry.
The Y J factor calculation uses the stress correction factors developed by Dolan and Broghamer . However, agreement could not be reached on the total content. The Association intends to continue working to update this Standard and to incorporate in future revisions the latest acceptable technology from domestic and international sources.
The formulas of this standard are not applicable when any of the following conditions exist: Exceptions The formulas of this standard are not applicable to determine rating capacity for other types of gear tooth deterioration such as plastic deformation, adhesive or abrasive wear, subcase fatigue, and scuffing.